“Haunted” quantum contextuality
نویسنده
چکیده
Two entangled particles in threedimensional Hilbert space (per particle) are considered in an EPR-type arrangement. On each side the Kochen-Specker observables {J 1 , J 2 2 , J 2 3 } and {J̄ 2 1 , J̄ 2 2 , J 2 3 } with [J 2 1 , J̄ 2 1 ] 6= 0 are measured. The outcomes of measurements of J 3 (via J 2 1 , J 2 2 ) and J 2 3 (via J̄ 1 , J̄ 2 2 ) are compared. We investigate the possibility that, although formally J 3 is associated with the same projection operator, a strong form of quantum contextuality states that an outcome depends on the complete disposition of the measurement apparatus, in particular whether J 1 or J̄ 2 1 is measured alongside. It is argued that in this case it is impossible to measure contextuality directly, a necessary condition being a non-operational counterfactuality of the argument. Besides complementarity, contextuality [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] is another, more subtle nonclassical feature of quantum mechanics. That is, one and the same physical observable may appear different, depending on the context of measurement; i.e., depending on the particular way it was inferred. Stated differently, the outcome of a physical measurement may depend also on other physical measurements which are coperformed. In Bell’s own words [1, section 5], “The result of an observation may reasonably depend not only on the state of the system . . . but also on the complete disposition of the apparatus.” This property is usually referred to as contextuality. Formally, contextuality may be related to the nonexistence of two-valued measures on Hilbert logics [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11] and the partial algebra of projection operators [12, 13] when the dimension of the Hilbert space is higher than two. Contextuality then expresses the impossibility to construct consistently truth values of the whole physical system by any arrangement of truth values of “proper parts” thereof. The term “proper part” refers to any maximal number of independent comeasurable observables corresponding to commuting self-adjoint operators. In quantum logics [14, 15], these are denoted by boolean
منابع مشابه
Quantum Contextuality in Quantum Mechanics and Beyond held in Prague on
Samson Abramsky University of Oxford, UK Contextuality and quantum advantage One way of understanding contextuality and its consequences is to see how it can be used to gain advantage in information-processing tasks. We show how quantum resources can be used to gain advantage in games witnessing the fundamental logical and computational concept of homomorphism between relational structures. Thi...
متن کاملContextuality, Cohomology and Paradox
Contextuality is a key feature of quantum mechanics that provides an important nonclassical resource for quantum information and computation. Abramsky and Brandenburger used sheaf theory to give a general treatment of contextuality in quantum theory [New Journal of Physics 13 (2011) 113036]. However, contextual phenomena are found in other fields as well, for example database theory. In this pa...
متن کاملAdvanced Analysis of Quantum Contextuality in a Psychophysical Double-Detection Experiment
The results of behavioral experiments typically exhibit inconsistent connectedness, i.e., they violate the condition known as “no-signaling,” “no-disturbance,” or “marginal selectivity.” This prevents one from evaluating these experiments in terms of quantum contextuality if the latter understood traditionally (as, e.g., in the Kochen-Specker theorem or Bell-type inequalities). The Contextualit...
متن کاملMeasuring Observable Quantum Contextuality
Contextuality is a central property in comparative analysis of classical, quantum, and supercorrelated systems. We examine and compare two well-motivated approaches to contextuality. One approach (“contextuality-by-default”) is based on the idea that one and the same physical property measured under different conditions (contexts) is represented by different random variables. The other approach...
متن کاملQuantum Contextuality with Stabilizer States
The Pauli groups are ubiquitous in quantum information theory because of their usefulness in describing quantum states and operations and their readily understood symmetry properties. In addition, the most well-understood quantum error correcting codes—stabilizer codes—are built using Pauli operators. The eigenstates of these operators—stabilizer states—display a structure (e.g., mutual orthogo...
متن کامل